A strong technology integration plan requires research-based practices and leadership support in order to achieve intentional and purposeful student learning. After reading through the research of both Crompton (2023) and Gonzales (2019), and reviewing the ISTE standards, it's clear that educators can develop a Technology Vision in order to better their school's effectiveness in technology use in education.
Crompton (2023) states key practices that lead to student growth while also aligning the ISTE Educator Standards. One of my biggest takeaways after reading, is how important continuous professional development opportunities are. Research showed that teachers who participate in technology-focused professional development will have better outcomes in the classroom with their students. This connects to ISTE Educator Standard 2.1: Learner, that explains the importance of professional growth. Another important practice described by Crompton is student-centered learning experiences. Students being able to engage with real-world problems and use technology while doing so, are more likely to be engaged in their learning. This aligns directly with ISTE Educator Standard 2.5: Designer, which explains how creating learner-driven environments is important for inclusion and equity. These key practices are vital in developing a. Technology Vision, specifically one that addresses the digital divide. Crompton states that technology alone doesn't improve student learning; instead, it depends on how well technology is actually aligned with teaching and curriculum. A strong vision must ensure access to devices, but also that all educators are prepared to deliver high-quality instruction when using these devices.
Gonzales (2019) emphasizes the challenges that educators and leaders may face when implementing 1:1 technology initiatives. The first major challenge is sustainability. School leaders have reported how difficult it can be to hole on to funding for devices and continue maintaining funding as updates arise. Also, it can be challenging for admin to get teachers who are willing to try something new when it comes to technology. Many that may feel they aren't effective with technology, resist the opportunity to learn more about it. A strong Technology Vision needs to address these challenges by assuring long-term funding is possible, offer support to staff through professional developments and trainings, and offer clear goals.
The ISTE standards for Students, Educators and Education Leaders give a framework for collaboration. Student Standards highlight the importance of engagement and active learning. Educator Standards encourage strong instructional practices and Leader Standards focus on supporting staff. Implementing these standards will help stakeholders align goals and ensure their is a consistent focus across the district and school. Lastly, the ISTE Essential Conditions focuses on a strong implementation by ensuring an equitable access, continuous professional development, and encouraging community involvement. This helps in focusing on common challenges of sustainability and inclusivity as well. Crompton (2023) and Gonzales (2019) show how a successful technology integration depends on educator support, teaching practices, and strong leadership.
References
Crompton, H. (2023). Evidence of the ISTE standards for educators leading to learning gains. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(4), 201–219.
Gonzales, M. M. (2019). School technology leadership vision and challenges: Perspectives from American school administrators. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(4), 697–708.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2017). ISTE standards for educators.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2018). ISTE standards for education leaders.
Ella,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your post, it felt very real in what we actually experience in schools. Your point about professional development really stuck with me. I’ve seen how technology can fall flat when teachers aren’t given the time or support to feel confident using it. It’s not enough to just hand out devices; we have to invest in the people using them, which connects well to ISTE Standard 2.1 (ISTE, 2017).
I also liked how you highlighted student-centered learning. When students are using technology to explore and solve real-world problems, the engagement is completely different. That’s when it actually feels meaningful and impactful for them.
Your discussion of sustainability and teacher buy-in also stood out. Those challenges are very real, and I agree that strong leadership and clear support systems make all the difference in whether a technology plan actually lasts and continues to grow over time.
Ella, I love your blog! You are very creative and artistic. I like how you were able to speak about what truly happens when schools try to implement something like this. Access and expectations are easy to discuss, but you mentioned what happens when funding gets tight, and when teachers are not comfortable using the technology. That’s when things usually start to fall apart. You also made it clear that this is not something leadership can walk away from. Without their participation and backing it, the plan isn’t going to hold together. I appreciate the fact that you used the ISTE standards to set it all up without pushing them into the conversation. And this is something I would also say, I love how your blog is designed. It looks clean, it reads easy, and it keeps your content front and center.
DeleteHi Ella! Your point about the "Learner" and "Designer" standards is spot on, it's a good reminder that technology shouldn't just be something that we add-on, but a way to encourage student-centered, real-world problem solving. I agree with your connection to Gonzales (2019), discussing the challenge of sustainability. Attaining new devices isn't the hard part, the real work lies in securing the funding and overcoming the resistance of staff through continuous support. Great job!
DeleteI really like how you connected both Crompton (2023) and Gonzales (2019) to building a strong Technology Vision. One thing that stood out to me was your emphasis on professional development. I agree that just giving teachers technology isn’t enough—it really comes down to whether they feel prepared and supported to use it effectively. Without that, even great tools can fall flat. Your point about student-centered learning also makes a lot of sense. I’ve noticed the same thing where students tend to be more engaged when they’re actively using technology to solve problems instead of just receiving information. It definitely lines up well with the ISTE standards and creating more meaningful learning experiences. I also appreciated your discussion of the challenges in Gonzales (2019), especially sustainability and teacher resistance. Those are real issues that can easily get overlooked. Funding and long-term maintenance are huge concerns, and I think the hesitation from teachers is understandable if they don’t feel confident with new tools.
ReplyDelete